4.7 Article

Enhanced selectivity of benzene-toluene-ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX) in direct conversion of n-butanol to aromatics over Zn modified HZSM5 catalysts

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111216

关键词

n-butanol; Aromatics; BTEX; Zn-HZSM5; XPS; Coke analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the direct conversion of n-butanol to aromatics using Zn-deposited HZSM5 catalysts, showing that the presence of Zn enhances the selectivities of aromatics and BTEX. Increasing temperature and decreasing WHSV also contribute to higher selectivities, but high pressure has a adverse effect on the aromatics selectivity.
The sustainable aromatics production from renewable source is indispensable to circumvallate the dependence on fossil fuel for commodity chemicals. Direct conversion of n-butanol to aromatics using xZn-HZSM5 (0-10 wt %, SiO2/Al2O3 = 23, 55 and 280) catalysts was proposed in the present investigation. Characterization studies revealed the formation of different Zn species depending on the Zn loading. Furthermore, XPS analysis confirmed strong interaction of Zn species with the electronegative oxygen atom of zeolite framework. Zn deposition enhanced the selectivities of aromatics and BTEX. The presence of Zn species suppressed the hydride transfer reaction and promoted the dehydrogenation reaction resulting in higher selectivities of aromatics and BTEX. The rising temperature and declining in WHSV enhanced the selectivities of aromatics and BTEX. The high pressure had adverse effect on the selectivities of aromatics. The maximum selectivity of total aromatics (74.83%) and BTEX (68.75%) were achieved at 723 K, 1 bar pressure and 0.75 h(-1) of WHSV. The coke analysis revealed the formation of polynuclear aromatic coke at high pressure. The alkyl substitute aromatics and polynuclear aromatics were formed predominately on pure HZSM5 (55) than 5Zn-HZSM5 (55). A plausible reaction mechanism was suggested considering the products distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据