4.4 Article

Quantification of heterogeneity in microstructural refinement in metals and alloys deformed to high plastic strains

期刊

MICRON
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2021.103107

关键词

EBSD; Plastic deformation; Microstructure heterogeneity; Dislocation boundaries; Recrystallization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the microstructure resulting from plastic deformation of metals and alloys, and presents a method for quantifying the uniformity of refinement by high angle boundaries. By comparing microstructures of samples processed by different routes, it demonstrates the utility of the method.
The microstructure resulting from plastic deformation of metals and alloys typically contains heterogeneity on several length scales. Here we discuss the characterization by electron backscatter diffraction of one particular aspect of such heterogeneity, namely the uniformity of refinement by high angle boundaries after application of large plastic strains. A recently developed method for the quantification of this type of heterogeneity, based on the identification of areas that remain relatively unrefined by high angle boundaries (quantified by the fraction of low misorientation regions, fLMR), is reviewed, and an extension of this method to quantity the degree of LMR clustering is presented. Additionaly, the required choices of parameters for use of this method are discussed and some general recommendations are given. The method is illustrated by a comparison of the microstructure in samples of aluminum heavily deformed by two different processing routes, where it is shown that the fLMR parameter provides a measure of both the efficiency and uniformity in refinement by high angle boundaries. It is also shown how this approach can be used to investigate the relationship between nucleation of recrystallization and deformation microstructure heterogeneity in samples deformed to large strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据