4.7 Article

Modern microfluidic approaches for determination of ions

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106845

关键词

Ion determination; Microfluidic chip; Pre-treatment; Ion chelating; Optical detection; Electrochemical detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62101231, 61771493]
  2. Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [20202BABL212003]
  3. Science and Technology Project of Education Department of Jiangxi Province of China [GJJ190510]
  4. PhD Research Startup Fund of Nanchang Hangkong University [EA202008205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on recent methods of ion measurement using microfluidic devices, highlighting potential applications in sample treatment, ion chelating mechanisms, and ion detection strategies, with promising developments in water quality monitoring, healthcare diagnostic testing, and portable device technologies.
Lab-on-a-chip technology has enabled the development of disruptive detection and analysis methods for life sciences and beyond. The miniaturization of existing (and sometimes well established) analysis techniques within microfluidic devices has the potential of resulting in the development of inexpensive, user-friendly and portable devices. This has been the case with ions detection from liquid samples, including water or biological samples like urine, blood and sweat, to name a few. We provide a critical review on recent microfluidic approaches for measurement of ions using microfluidic devices, covering sample treatment (pre-concentration and separation), various ion chelating mechanisms (immunoassay, nucleic acid and chemical chelating) and varying ion detection strategies (optical, electrochemical and colorimetric). It identified areas of development and opportunities mostly in water quality and environment monitoring but also in healthcare diagnostic testing, including detection with smartphones and wearable microfluidic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据