4.7 Article

Steam reforming of phenol as biomass tar model compound over Ni/Al2O3 catalyst

期刊

FUEL
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 629-636

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.036

关键词

Ni/Al2O3 catalyst; Biomass gasification; Tar model compound; Phenol; Steam reforming

资金

  1. University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU
  2. UK Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council through Supergen Bioenergy Grant [EP/M013162/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/J005029/1, EP/M013162/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M013162/1, EP/J005029/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalytic steam reforming of phenol over Ni/Al2O3 catalyst with 10 wt% of Ni loading was carried out in a fixed bed reactor. The effect of temperature (650-800 degrees C), reaction time (20-80 min) and catalyst amount (0-2 g corresponding to 0-4.5 g(cat) h g(phenol)(1)) on carbon conversion, H-2 potential and catalyst deactivation was studied. High efficiency of Ni/Al2O3 catalyst in steam reforming of phenol is observed at 750 degrees C for a reaction time of 60 min when 1.5 g of catalyst (3.4 g(cat) h g(phenol)(1)) is used, with carbon conversion and H2 potential being 81 and 59%, respectively. An increase in temperature enhances phenol reforming reaction as well as coke gasification, minimizing its deposition over the catalyst. However, at high temperatures (800 degrees C) an increase in Ni crystal size is observed indicating catalyst irreversible deactivation by sintering. As catalyst time on stream is increased the coke amount deposited over the catalyst increases, but no differences in Ni crystal size are observed. An increase in catalyst amount from 0 to 1.5 g increases H-2 potential, but no further improvement is observed above 1.5 g. It is not observed significant catalyst deactivation by coke deposition, with the coke amount deposited over the catalyst being lower than 5% in all the runs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据