4.7 Article

Understanding the pyrolysis mechanism of polyvinylchloride (PVC) by characterizing the chars produced in a wire-mesh reactor

期刊

FUEL
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 526-532

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.034

关键词

Polyvinylchloride; Pyrolysis; Char; Wire-mesh reactor; Secondary reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576080]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Hubei, China [2015BCE056]
  3. Innovation Foundation of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [2015650011]
  4. Analytical and Testing Center at the Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to understand the fundamental mechanism of the pyrolysis of polyvinylchloride (PVC) by investigating the chars produced in a wire-mesh reactor, where the interactions of evolving volatiles and pyrolysing PVC particles as well as the secondary reactions of the volatiles are minimized. The initiation of PVC pyrolysis can start at a temperature as low as 200 degrees C on the surface of PVC particles via dehydrochlorination, as confirmed by the surface color change and the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results. However, significant dehydrochlorination reaction mainly starts at similar to 300 degrees C, leading to the formation of conjugated polyene sequences. The results also suggest that the cyclization/aromatization reaction may take place at the early stage of the dehydrochlorination process, as the hydrocarbon release already starts (i.e., at similar to 350 degrees C with a Cl loss of similar to 80%) before the termination of the dehydrochlorination process. The initial released hydrocarbons have an H/C atomic ratio close to 1, more likely via intramolecular cyclization/aromatization reaction. However, the contribution of the hydrocarbon release to weight loss is small at low temperatures (<450 degrees C), and the majority of the weight loss is caused by the dehydrochlorination. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据