4.5 Review

The effect of mind-body exercise on blood pressure in middle-aged and elderly patients with hypertension A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 100, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026452

关键词

blood pressure; hypertension; meta-analysis; middle-aged and elderly patients; mind-body exercise; protocol

资金

  1. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2020GXNSFAA297115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to explore the effect and safety of mind-body exercise intervention on the blood pressure in middle-aged and elderly patients with hypertension through meta-analysis. The results are expected to provide more reliable evidence-based medical evidence for clinical practice.
Background: Depending on the person, cervical spondylosis may have no clinical symptoms, but cervical spondylosis will definitely cause changes in people's blood pressure, which will further affect physical and mental health. Objectives: This study aims to explore the effect and safety of mind-body exercise intervention on the blood pressure in middle-aged and elderly patients with hypertension through meta-analysis. Methods: This meta-analysis searched studies from 4 research databases: the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (from 1979), Web of Science (from 1950), PubMed (from 1965), and Cochrane (from 1991), Date of retrieval: January 22, 2021, Two authors will independently search literature records, scan titles, abstracts, and full texts, collect data, and assess materials for risk of bias. The data will be analyzed by Stata 14.0 software. Results: The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis program with no results. Data analysis will be completed after the program has been completed. Discussion: This meta-analysis may provide clinical practice with more reliable evidence-based medical evidence that mind-body exercise can benefit the blood pressure of middle-aged and elderly hypertensive patients. INPLASY Registration Number: INPLASY202130072.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据