How rural immersion training influences rural work orientation of medical students: Theory building through realist evaluation

Aim To develop theory about how contexts and mechanisms interact to contribute to openness to future rural practice by medical students undertaking immersive rural training. Methods A realist evaluation based on RAMESES II protocol. We interviewed 23 students exploring Contexts (C) which were external (place-based) and internal (the student's characteristics), Mechanisms (M) (that drive a response) and Outcomes (O) (openness to rural work). Results 'Openness to rural work' related to: a desire to live rurally, work in rural medicine, or consider this as a possibility. This was triggered by responses to experience in rural places of an aspirational, intellectual and emotional nature (mechanisms). Students most affected were those with a strong motivation to help others and who value teamwork. Students with clearly envisaged career paths suited to metropolitan areas, or those retaining/prioritising strong social and community ties in metropolitan areas were less likely to commit to future rural work. Conclusion Our theory indicates multi-level stimuli activates openness. Implications are that rural immersion programs could select students with an orientation towards teamwork, without pre-set professional ideation, and with a strong commitment to helping others. Experiencing rural immersion will trigger aspirational, intellectual and emotional responses leading to rural work openness for such students.

Automated summary

The study found that openness to rural work was related to a desire to live rurally, work in rural medicine, or consider this as a possibility. This openness was triggered by aspirational, intellectual, and emotional responses to experiences in rural places. Students who are motivated to help others and value teamwork were most affected.