4.6 Article

Technical Note: Range verification of pulsed proton beams from fixed-field alternating gradient accelerator by means of time-of-flight measurement of ionoacoustic waves

期刊

MEDICAL PHYSICS
卷 48, 期 9, 页码 5490-5500

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mp.15060

关键词

ionoacoustics; proton therapy; range verification

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [21H02859]
  2. JST FOREST [JPMJFR200X]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21H02859] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that a submillimeter range accuracy can be achieved using a pulsed beam from a fixed-field alternating gradient accelerator, and the relative TOF method helps improve measurement precision.
Purpose: Ionoacoustics is one of the promising approaches to verify the beam range in proton therapy. However, the weakness of the wave signal remains a main hindrance to its application in clinics. Here we studied the potential use of a fixed-field alternating gradient accelerator (FFA), one of the accelerator candidates for future proton therapy. For such end, magnitude of the pressure wave and range accuracy achieved by the short-pulsed beam of FFA were assessed, using both simulation and experimental procedure. Methods: A 100 MeV proton beam from the FFA was applied on a water phantom, through the acrylic wall. The beam range measured by the Bragg peak (BP)-ionization chamber (BPC) was 77.6 mm, while the maximum dose at BP was estimated to be 0.35 Gy/pulse. A hydrophone was placed 20 mm downstream of the BP, and signals were amplified and stored by a digital oscilloscope, averaged, and low-pass filtered. Time-of-flight (TOF) and two relative TOF values were analyzed in order to determine the beam range. Furthermore, an acoustic wave transport simulation was conducted to estimate the amplitude of the pressure waves. Results: The range calculated when using two relative TOF was 78.16 +/- 0.01 and 78.14 +/- 0.01 mm, respectively, both values being coherent with the range measured by the BPC (the difference was 0.5-0.6 mm). In contrast, utilizing the direct TOF resulted in a range error of 1.8 mm. Fivefold and 50-fold averaging were required to suppress the range variation to below 1 mm for TOF and relative TOF measures, respectively. The simulation suggested the magnitude of pressure wave at the detector exceeded 7 Pascal. Conclusion: A submillimeter range accuracy was attained with a pulsed beam of about 21 ns from an FFA, at a clinical energy using relative TOF. To precisely quantify the range with a single TOF measurement, subsequent improvement in the measuring system is required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据