4.6 Article

The effects on mortality and the associated financial costs of wood heater pollution in a regional Australian city

期刊

MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
卷 215, 期 6, 页码 269-272

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51199

关键词

Public health; Air pollutants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study estimated that in Armidale, 14 premature deaths per year are attributable to long term exposure to wood heater PM2.5 pollution, resulting in 210 years of life lost. The estimated financial cost is $32.8 million, or $10,930 per wood heater per year.
Objectives To estimate the annual burden of mortality and the associated health costs attributable to air pollution from wood heaters in Armidale. Design Health impact assessment (excess annual mortality and financial costs) based upon atmospheric PM2.5 measurements. Setting Armidale, a regional Australian city (population, 24 504) with high levels of air pollution in winter caused by domestic wood heaters, 1 May 2018 - 30 April 2019. Main outcome measures Estimated population exposure to PM2.5 from wood heaters; estimated numbers of premature deaths and years of life lost. Results Fourteen premature deaths (95% CI, 12-17 deaths) per year, corresponding to 210 (95% CI, 172-249) years of life lost, are attributable to long term exposure to wood heater PM2.5 pollution in Armidale. The estimated financial cost is $32.8 million (95% CI, $27.0-38.5 million), or $10 930 (95% CI, $9004-12 822) per wood heater per year. Conclusions The substantial mortality and financial cost attributable to wood heating in Armidale indicates that effective policies are needed to reduce wood heater pollution, including public education about the effects of wood smoke on health, subsidies that encourage residents to switch to less polluting home heating (perhaps as part of an economic recovery package), assistance for those affected by wood smoke from other people, and regulations that reduce wood heater use (eg, by not permitting new wood heaters and requiring existing units to be removed when houses are sold).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据