4.7 Article

Homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) combustion of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (PODE)

期刊

FUEL
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 206-213

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.033

关键词

Polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers; Homogeneous charge compression ignition; Heat release; Equivalence ratio; Exhaust gas recirculation

资金

  1. Project of the National Key Basic Research Plan (Chinese 973 Plan) [2013CB228404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (PODE) are a promising alternative fuel for diesel engines. PODE have high volatility, high ignitability and high oxygen content, and is thus also an ideal additive fuel for blend and dual-fuel combustion due to its low-temperature chemistry. In this work, the characteristics of PODE homogenous charge compression ignition (HCCI) combustion are investigated for the first time. The effects of charge mass equivalence ratio (Phi(m)) and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) on PODE HCCI are studied. The results indicate that PODE HCCI exhibits two-stage ignition with a strong low temperature heat release (LTHR) before the high temperature heat release (HTHR). HTHR switches from one-stage to two-stage with an increase of Phi(m) due to rapid CO oxidation. At a specific EGR rate, with an increase of Phi(m), the end-of-compression charge temperature decreases, the ignition timing of LTHR delays. With an increase of Phi(m), the ignition timing of the HTHR advances at the EGR lower than 42%, but it delays at the EGR of 52% in general. For a specific Phi(m), with an increase of EGR, the end-of-compression charge temperature decreases, the ignition timing of both LTHR and HTHR delays, and the combustion duration of the HTHR increases. CO emissions decrease with an increase of Phi(m) and a decrease of EGR. Phi(m) and EGR have only a slight effect on HC emissions. This work also provides fundamental data of PODE combustion characteristics for the future development of PODE reaction mechanisms. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据