4.7 Article

Design and analysis of Lamina Emergent Joint (LEJ) based on origami technology and mortise-tenon structure

期刊

MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104298

关键词

Compliant mechanisms; Lamina Emergent Joint; Origami technology; Mortise and tenon joint; Compliance matrix

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51475037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a design method to achieve large deformation of Lamina Emergent torsional (LET) joints in multiple directions through origami technology, and proposes a Foldable mortise-tenon structure (FMTS). The influence of structural parameters of the FMTS on its maximum deformation and maximum stress under tension is studied. A two degree of freedom Lamina Emergent Joint (2DOF-LEJ) is designed based on the proposed method and structure, and its effectiveness is verified through experimental tests.
Lamina Emergent Mechanisms (LEMs) are an important part of compliant mechanisms, and origami technology can fold simple two-dimensional planes into complex threedimensional geometries. This paper introduces a design method to achieve large deformation of Lamina Emergent torsional (LET) joints in multiple directions through origami technology. A Foldable mortise-tenon structure (FMTS) is proposed to make permanent creases in origami-based mechanisms. The influence of structural parameters of the FMTS on its maximum deformation and maximum stress under tension is studied. Based on the proposed method and structure, a two degree of freedom Lamina Emergent Joint (2DOF-LEJ) is designed. The structural design, equivalent stiffness analysis, and finite element analysis (FEA) of the 2DOF-LEJ are carried out. Experimental tests verify the effectiveness of the proposed method and FMTS on the prototype. Finally, some applications of the proposed method and FMTS in origami-based mechanisms are discussed. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据