4.5 Article

A model for tensile modulus of halloysite-nanotube-based samples assuming the distribution and networking of both nanoparticles and interphase zone after mechanical percolation

期刊

MECHANICS OF ADVANCED MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
卷 29, 期 27, 页码 5704-5713

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1962457

关键词

Halloysite nanotubes (HNT); polymer nanocomposites; tensile modulus; interphase section; filler network; mechanical percolation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a model for the tensile modulus of HNT-reinforced system and validates the predictability of the model through experimental data. The study finds that the modulus of HNT-based system is influenced by various factors, such as the size, modulus, and characteristics of the interphase sections of HNT.
There are few modeling papers on the mechanical behavior of halloysite nanotubes (HNT)-based system, which restrict the applications of these materials in advanced fields. In this paper, a model for tensile modulus of HNT-reinforced system is advanced based on Kolarik equation assuming the concentrations and moduli of dispersed HNT, networked HNT and interphase sections nearby the dispersed and networked HNT. The calculations of the advanced model at a number of levels of all factors are justified. Furthermore, numerous samples are used to confirm the forecasts of the established model by experimental data. The modulus of HNT-based system enhances by low HNT radius, high HNT length, high modulus of networked interphase section, high network modulus, low percolation onset, high modulus of interphase section around the dispersed HNT, great HNT modulus and high network percentage. The nonattendance of interphase section causes the nanocomposite's modulus of 2.24 GPa, whereas the modulus of samples improves to 3.15 GPa by the interphase depth of 25 nm. Additionally, the experimental data of several samples containing different types of polymer media and HNT validate the predictability of the established model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据