Variation in the terminology and methodologies applied to the analysis of water holding capacity in meat research

Studies examining meat quality variation, possibly resulting from animal physiology, processing, or ingredient additions, are likely to include at least one measure of water holding capacity (WHC). Methods for evaluating WHC can be classified as direct or indirect. Direct methods either gauge natural release of fluids from muscle or require the application of force to express water. The indirect methods do not actually measure WHC. They attempt to separate meat into two or three categories based on predictions of direct method results: the extreme of high and low WHC and an optional 'normal' group. Considerable statistical analyses are required to generate these predictive models. Presently, there are inconsistent terms (e.g., water holding, WHC, water binding, water binding potential/capacity) used to describe WHC and no standardized techniques recommended to evaluate it. To ensure that results can be compared across different laboratories, a better consensus must be reached in how these terms are employed and how this critical parameter is determined.

Automated summary

Studies on meat quality variations often include measuring water holding capacity (WHC). Methods for evaluating WHC can be classified as direct or indirect, with direct methods requiring statistical analyses to generate predictive models.