4.7 Article

Millimeter-wave free-space dielectric characterization

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109472

关键词

Millimeter wave; Dielectric; Permittivity; Free-space; Quasi-optical; Calibration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61871003]
  2. open project of the state key laboratory of complex electromagnetic environment effects on electronics and information system [CEMEE2021Z0201B]
  3. Openended Foundation of National Radar Signal Processing Laboratory [61424100105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews non-resonant free-space measurement techniques for dielectric permittivity in the millimeter wave range, using vector network analysis. It discusses various systems, theoretical models, extraction algorithms, and calibration methods, as well as the measurement of different types of samples. The advantages of free-space material extraction methods are compared with resonance and transmission line methods, with a perspective on future developments.
Millimeter wave technologies have widespread applications, for which dielectric permittivity is a fundamental parameter. The non-resonant free-space measurement techniques for dielectric permittivity using vector network analysis in the millimeter wave range are reviewed. An introductory look at the applications, significance, and properties of dielectric permittivity in the millimeter wave range is addressed first. The principal aspects of freespace millimeter wave measurement methods are then discussed, by assessing a variety of systems, theoretical models, extraction algorithms and calibration methods. In addition to conventional solid dielectric materials, the measurement of artificial metamaterials, liquid, and gaseous-phased samples are separately investigated. The pros of free-space material extraction methods are then compared with resonance and transmission line methods, and their future perspective is presented in the concluding part.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据