4.7 Article

Toward automatic analysis of random monolayers: The effect of pair correlation

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109536

关键词

Imaging particle analysis; Spherical particle monolayer; Fourier transform; Power spectral density; Pair-correlation function; Nanoparticle adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel approach to analyzing random monolayers of sphere-like features using power spectral density (PSD), demonstrated on the example of monolayer height function PSD. The analysis shows that two components of the function depend on the pair-correlation function, providing means to determine particle size, surface coverage, and radius of analyzed area with relative errors less than 0.3%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. The results suggest that the radial distribution function significantly affects the PSD, making it a promising tool for characterizing particle or cavity monolayers quantitatively.
The paper presents a novel approach to analyzing random monolayers of sphere-like features, based on power spectral density (PSD) of the monolayer image. We have demonstrated the new method on the example of PSD of monolayer height function. Formal analysis of the PSD for monolayers of spherical, hemispherical, and hemicapsular particles or cavities shows that two components of the function depend on the pair-correlation function. We have determined them for specific-type monolayers at several values of surface coverage. Least-squares fitting of the continuous equation describing the PSD to numerical data obtained from discrete PSD computations provides means to determine particle size, surface coverage, and radius of analyzed area with the relative errors less than 0.3%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. Our results suggest that the radial distribution function has a strong effect on the PSD, which makes the latter a promising tool for the quantitative characterization of particle or cavity monolayers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据