4.7 Article

Practical applicability of processing static, short-observation-time raw GNSS measurements provided by a smartphone under tree vegetation

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109397

关键词

Android smartphone; Horizontal accuracy; Dual-frequency; Multi-constellation GNSS; Raw GNSS measurements; RTKLIB

资金

  1. Scientific Grant Agency (VEGA) of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic
  2. Slovak Academy of Sciences [1/0868/18, 1/0335/20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By analyzing 10-minute long static GNSS measurements under different conditions, the study confirmed the feasibility of achieving centimeter-level positioning accuracy under open-sky conditions, while vegetation significantly affects positioning performance. Carrier-phase and code-based solutions both have their advantages, but code-based measurements are more important for all smartphones with Android 7 or higher.
In this study we investigate practical feasibility and horizontal accuracy of 10-minute long static GNSS measurements acquired using an Android-based Xiaomi Mi8 smartphone. Measurements were collected during 40 days on three points with different tree canopy conditions. The accuracy was analyzed with regard to measurement conditions, usage of ground plane, application of different frequencies, and processing methods. The possibility to achieve even centimeter-level accuracy under open-sky conditions was confirmed, but the vegetation significantly reduces the positioning performance. Although the carrier-phase-based solutions provided the best results in some cases, these are prone to very high variability of results. The code-based measurements can be more important, as these are available for all smartphones with Android 7 or higher (in contrast with carrier-phase measurements), and provided sub-meter accuracy under optimal conditions and accuracy better than standard smartphone positioning methods under conditions with tree canopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据