4.6 Article

Deep-level transient spectroscopy of GaN grown by electrochemical deposition and irradiated with alpha particles

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2021.105685

关键词

Electrochemical deposition; GaN; DLTS; Defects; Irradiation

资金

  1. South African National Research Foundation (NRF) [111744]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the growth of GaN using electrochemical deposition on different substrates and found that the properties of the film were influenced by both the substrate type and deposition conditions. X-ray diffraction analysis revealed a mixture of hexagonal and cubic structures in the film, with crystallite sizes ranging from 11 nm to 18 nm. Schottky diodes fabricated on the thin films demonstrated specific electrical characteristics, including barrier height and carrier density, which changed after irradiation with alpha particles.
Gallium nitride, which is used in modern electronic devices, is generally grown employing expensive epitaxial techniques. This study investigated the growth of GaN using electrochemical deposition and compared the use of two substrates, silicon (111) and indium tin oxide, under different conditions. Using different characterization techniques, it was found that the properties of the film depended on both the substrate and deposition conditions. X-ray diffraction demonstrated the presence of mainly hexagonal but also a small amount of cubic structures with crystallite sizes ranging from between 11 nm and 18 nm. Schottky diodes were fabricated on the thin films deposited on Si (111) and were characterized using I-V, C-V and DLTS measurements. The Schottky diodes had a rectification ratio of about 20, a I-V barrier height of 0.58 eV, a C-V barrier height of 1.18 eV and carrier density of 1.1 x 10(18) cm(-3). In the as-grown material, only one defect state at 0.32 eV below the conduction band was observed. However, after irradiation with high-energy alpha particles, four defect states at 0.10 eV, 0.20 eV, 0.42 eV and 0.51 eV were observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据