4.7 Article

Lateral size effect of reduced graphene oxide on properties of copper matrix composites

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141579

关键词

Graphene; Copper matrix composite; Layered structure; Mechanical property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51671069, 51801043]
  2. State Administration of Science Technology and Industry for National Defense [JCKYS2019603C017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene/copper composites with graphene oxide sheets of different lateral sizes were prepared and their effects on the properties of the composites were investigated. It was found that the distribution and performance varied with the size of graphene sheets in the composites. This study contributes to a better understanding of the formation mechanism of hierarchical layered graphene/copper composites and the development of composite structural design based on graphene.
Graphene/copper composite using graphene oxide sheets with three kinds of lateral sizes (-0.92 mu m, -5.49 mu m and -13.73 mu m) were prepared via molecular level mixing method and spark plasma sintering process. The lateral size effects of graphene on the structure, mechanical performance, thermal and electrical conductivities of the composites were investigated while the volume fraction of graphene remained 2.5 vol%. For microstructure, small-sized graphene sheets (denoted as SRGO) tend to distribute randomly in the composites while middle-sized (denoted as MRGO) and large-sized graphene sheets (denoted as LRGO) are prone to form the carbon-rich aggregate with micro-layered structure. MRGO/Cu composite has the highest tensile yield strength (663 MPa) while SRGO/Cu composite exhibits the most excellent thermal and electrical conductivities (334 W/(m & times; K), 82 %IACS) among the three composites. This work provides a better understanding the formation mechanism of hierarchical layered graphene/Cu composite and can further promote the development of architectural design of graphene based composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据