4.7 Article

Relationship between welding conditions, abnormal grain growth and mechanical performance in friction-stir welded 6061-T6 aluminum alloy

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141409

关键词

Characterization; Aluminium alloys; Plasticity methods; Grains and interfaces; Plasticity

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-49-02001]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-49-02001] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between welding conditions, annealing behavior, and mechanical performance of friction-stir welded 6061-T6 aluminum alloy was examined in this study. It was found that the welded material was unstable against abnormal grain growth during post-weld solutionizing treatment, with a lowering of FSW heat input inhibiting this phenomenon. Abnormal grain growth was observed to lead to a rotation of the original crystallographic texture, and may be governed by the orientation-growth mechanism.
In this work, a relationship between welding conditions, annealing behavior, and mechanical performance of friction-stir welded (FSWed) 6061-T6 aluminum alloy was examined. In the entire studied FSW range, the welded material was found to be unstable against abnormal grain growth during post-weld solutionizing treatment. However, a lowering of the FSW heat input tended to inhibit this undesirable phenomenon. In addition to the stir zone, the abnormal microstructural coarsening was also observed in the heat-affected zone, whereas the thermo-mechanically affected zone experienced static recrystallization. In all cases, the abnormal grain growth was found to result in similar to 25-35 degrees <110> rotation of the original crystallographic texture. Hence, this process was suggested to be governed by the orientation-growth mechanism. Due to the relatively high strain-hardening ability intrinsic to the coarse-grained materials, the abnormal grains suppressed tensile strain in the stir zone during transverse tensile tests thus degrading weld ductility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据