4.6 Article

Enhanced simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of Napier grass and Napier silage for two stage bio-hydrogen and methane production using organosolv and hydrothermal

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 267, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124614

关键词

Chemical pretreatment; Second generation biomass; Energy crop; Two-stage anaerobic digestion; Energy yield analysis

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. [PHD/0095/2556]
  2. Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) Senior Research Scholar [RTA6280001]
  3. National Research Council of Thailand through Khon Kaen University [6100080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that organosolv pretreatment significantly increased hydrogen yields from Napier grass and silage, leading to higher methane production in a two-stage process.
This study aims to enhance the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of Napier grass and silage for two-stage bio-hydrogen and methane production using organosolv and hydrothermal pretreatments. The organosolv pretreatment of Napier grass and silage, catalyzed by sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid, substantially increased hydrogen yields 1.34 and 1.55 times compared with those of untreated Napier grass and silage, respectively. In the second-stage fermentation, the hydrogenic effluents from each treatment were further converted to methane. A maximum methane yield of 278.2 +/- 3.2 and 263.4 +/- 6.2 mL/g-substrateadded was obtained from the effluents of the auto-catalyzed (without catalysts) organosolv-pretreated Napier grass and silage, respectively. Consequently, a maximum total energy yield of 11.0 kJ/g-substrateadded and 10.4 kJ/g-substrateadded was gained from the auto-catalyzed Napier grass and silage, respectively. The organosolv pretreatment of Napier grass and silage was more successful in the two-stage SSF hydrogen and methane production than the hydrothermal pretreatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据