4.7 Article

Synthesis and application of Cu(OH)2 nanowires on nanoporous copper prepared by dealloying Ti50Cu50 and Ti25Zr25Cu50 amorphous alloys

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111258

关键词

Amorphous ribbons; Nanoporous copper; Anodic oxidation; Catalytic properties; Cu(OH)(2)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52071126]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City China [19JCZDJC38300]
  3. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Integrated Logistics Support [6142003190410]
  4. Foundation Strengthening Program [2019-JCJQ-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, nanoporous copper was prepared by dealloying Ti50Cu50 and Ti25Zr25Cu50 amorphous ribbons. The resulting copper hydroxide with catalytic properties was used in the electro-oxidation of methanol. Ti25Zr25Cu50 showed a higher current density compared to Ti50Cu50, and the current density increased gradually with the increase of methanol concentration.
In the present study, nanoporous copper was prepared by dealloying Ti50Cu50 and Ti25Zr25Cu50 amorphous ribbons. The copper hydroxide with catalytic properties was prepared by anodic oxidation on the surface with different porosity rate of copper (nano). In the process of dealloying, due to the large difference of potential between Ti and Cu, Ti was firstly dissolved. After oxidation, the as-obtained hybrid electrodes were applied in the electro-oxidation of methanol in alkaline media. The current density of Ti25Zr25Cu50 (21 mA cm-2) was higher than that obtained form Ti50Cu50 (16 mA cm-2) in a mixture solution of 0.1 M NaOH containing 0.08 M methanol. With the increase of methanol concentration, the current density increased gradually. When the concentration of the methanol was higher than 0.08 M, the current density increased slowly, being limited by the surface area of the composite electrode. These results can help to produce low-cost, methanol-based fuel cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据