4.5 Article

Quality monitoring in additive manufacturing using emission spectroscopy and unsupervised deep learning

期刊

MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
卷 37, 期 11, 页码 1339-1346

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2021.1906891

关键词

Laser; additive; manufacturing; DED; quality; monitoring; unsupervised; deep; learning; feature; extraction

资金

  1. NIST [F050663]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study has developed a novel unsupervised recognition model for quality monitoring of parts printed by directed energy deposition (DED). Experimental verifications show that the proposed method can effectively distinguish between qualified and unqualified printed parts.
Widespread adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) is hindered by the low quality and reproducibility of printed parts. In-situ quality monitoring technologies provide early defect detection and correction capability for AM processes and are crucial for part quality assurance. Research on in-situ monitoring and control of AM is exceptionally challenging due to the numerous variations and complex reactions in AM. This study has developed a novel unsupervised recognition model for the quality of parts printed by directed energy deposition (DED). This model consists of a long short-term memory-based autoencoder (LSTM-Autoencoder) and a K-means clustering. The LSTM-Autoencoder automatically extracts features from spectra collected during the DED process, and the K-means clustering model is employed for the deposition quality classification. Experimental verifications are conducted on the quality recognition of Al7075 alloy depositions printed under different conditions by varying the laser power, printing speed, and powder delivery rate. The results show that the proposed method can discern between the unqualified depositions with rough surfaces and high porosity from the qualified depositions correctly. This proposed LSTM-Autoencoder is data-driven and thus may be applied to printing conditions not tested within this work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据