4.6 Article

Ship service life extension considering ship condition and remaining design life

期刊

MARINE STRUCTURES
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.102940

关键词

Service life extension; Bayesian updating; Cost-benefit analysis; Ship management; Optimization

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI-1537926]
  2. US Office of Naval Research (ONR) Award [N00014-08-1-0188, N00014-12-1-0023, N00014-16-1-2299]
  3. US Department of Transportation Region 3 University Transportation Center Award [CIAM-UTC-REG6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reliable and continuous operation of ships is crucial, but extending ship service life may come with higher failure risk and additional maintenance costs. Therefore, a cost-benefit evaluation is necessary to determine the optimal duration of service life extension and associated maintenance actions.
Reliable and continuous operation of ships is vitally important to the decision-makers. Driven by the rising cost of newbuilding ships, maintenance actions are needed on existing ships to ensure safe and enduring service beyond their initial design life. Extending ship service life can provide economic operating profit and promote sustainability. Meanwhile, ships during their extended service life may involve higher failure risk and additional maintenance expenditure. Therefore, a cost-benefit evaluation is imperative for determining the optimal duration of service life extension (SLE) and the associated maintenance actions. In this paper, a novel method for this purpose is proposed. Two cost-benefit indicators, benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and net present value (NPV) are used to optimize the duration of SLE. Using Bayesian updating, information on the remaining design life and the structural condition at the SLE decision is incorporated into the optimization process to better inform SLE decision-making. The proposed method is illustrated by a fatiguesensitive very large crude carrier (VLCC) at both structural component and structural system levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据