4.7 Article

Increasing dominance of dinoflagellate red tides in the coastal waters of Yellow Sea, China

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112439

关键词

Harmful algal bloom; Red tide; Green tide; Eutrophication; Climate change; Mariculture

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19060203]
  2. CAS-CSIRO BAU project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [GJHZ201973]
  3. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
  4. National Key R&D Program by the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST) [2016YFE0101500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Yellow Sea has been experiencing harmful algal blooms for decades, with an increasing dominance of dinoflagellate red tides. This dominance is closely linked with eutrophication and mariculture industry development. Different features of dinoflagellate red tides in the northern and southern Yellow Sea, with apparent changes in the southern Yellow Sea possibly caused by recurrent large-scale green tides in the last decade.
The Yellow Sea (YS) has been subjected to harmful algal blooms (HABs) for several decades. In this study, we compiled and analyzed a dataset of 165 red tides from 1972 to 2017 and a dataset of green tides from 2008 to 2017 in the YS. The most notable feature of red tides in the YS is the increasing dominance of dinoflagellate red tides in terms of frequency, scale, seasonal distribution, spatial coverage, and red tide causative species. The increasing dominance of dinoflagellate red tides is closely related to eutrophication and the development of the mariculture industry in the YS. However, the dinoflagellate red tides in the northern Yellow Sea (NYS) and the southern Yellow Sea (SYS) have different features. The apparent changes in red tides in the SYS in terms of frequency and seasonal patterns might have been caused by recurrent large-scale green tides in the last decade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据