4.7 Article

Spatial distribution and risk assessment of heavy metals pollution in soils of marine origin in central Saudi Arabia

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112605

关键词

Heavy metal contamination; Potential ecological risk; Al Uyaynah-Al Jubailah region; Central Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the sources and ecological risks of heavy metal contamination in soils of marine origin in central Saudi Arabia. Results showed that most of the soil samples had low risk, with only a small percentage categorized as moderate risk. Some heavy metals in the soil originated from natural processes, while others were attributed to anthropogenic processes, mainly from chemicals used in agriculture and phosphorus fertilizers.
The present work aimed to evaluate the sources and ecological risks of heavy metal (HM) contamination in the soils of marine origin in central Saudi Arabia. HM concentrations were determined in 30 soil samples in October 2020, from Al Uyaynah-Al Jubailah region and their averages were in the following order: Al > Fe > Zn > Cr > Pb > Ni > As > Cu > Se > Cd > Hg > Sb. Average values of Zn, Ni, Co, Cr, and Cu in the investigated soils were less than averages of the continental crust, worldwide soils, and European soils, in contrast to the average values of As, Hg, Cd, and Se which were greater than the continental crust and worldwide soils. Enrichment factor, contamination factor, and degree of contamination revealed minor enriched and moderate contamination factors with As, Se, Hg, and Pb. Potential ecological risk index indicated that 93.33% of the soil samples fell under no-to low risk, whereas 6.67% were categorized as moderate risk. Multivariate statistical analyses determined natural processes for Pb, Al, Cr, Sb, Zn, Fe, and Ni, while anthropogenic processes for As, Hg, and Se, mainly attributed to the chemicals used in agricultural applications and P fertilizers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据