4.3 Article

Against all odds: Harbor porpoises intensively use an anthropogenically modified estuary

期刊

MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 288-303

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12858

关键词

classification; C-POD; Ems; estuary; harbor porpoise; passive acoustic monitoring; Phocoena phocoena; Random Forest; Wadden Sea

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Harbor porpoises are present year-round in the anthropogenically modified Ems Estuary, with their occurrence mainly explained by season, tide, and noise level. Their presumed feeding activity is detected in almost half of the positive blocks, indicating the importance of the estuary as a regular feeding area.
Harbor porpoises (Cetacea) are present in the North Sea throughout the year but periodically enter adjacent estuaries, which due to human activities are among the planet's most threatened aquatic systems. However, the occurrence of harbor porpoises in estuaries has rarely been studied. In this work, harbor porpoise occurrence at two stations in the anthropogenically modified Ems Estuary (Germany, Netherlands) was modeled using a machine learning approach (Random Forest) that drew on 8 years of acoustic monitoring data with C-PODs together with environmental data. Harbor porpoises were present year-round at both stations. According to the models, their detection was mainly explained by season, tide, and noise level, with the highest detection probabilities in spring, at high tide, and at low noise levels. The seasonal and tide-dependent occurrence of harbor porpoises coincided with prey availability. Presumed feeding activity was detected in 47% of all harbor-porpoise-positive 10 min blocks and indicated the importance of the estuary as a regular feeding area. The elevated noise levels detected at one station were attributed to tidal-induced currents and sediment movements. The results of this study can help to improve estuarine management through measures that include conducting dredging and disposal activities when harbor porpoise occurrence is less likely.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据