4.7 Article

Self-Assembled Vesicles from Mixed Brush Nanoparticles in Solution

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 54, 期 11, 页码 5144-5154

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00503

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA-0003525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coarse-grained simulations reveal that binary polymer-grafted nanoparticles can form various structures, including double-walled vesicles, in a selective solvent. Whether randomly grafted or Janus-grafted, the polymers phase-separate on the surface of the NP to form distinct structures.
The self-assembly of binary polymer-grafted nanoparticles (NPs) in a selective solvent is investigated using coarse-grained simulations. Simulations are performed using theoretically informed Langevin dynamics (TILD), a particle-based method that employs a particle-to-mesh scheme to efficiently calculate the nonbonded interactions. The particles are densely grafted with two immiscible polymers, A and B, that are permanently bound to the NP either at random grafting sites (random-grafted) or with all the A chains on one hemisphere of the NP and all the B chains on the other hemisphere (Janus-grafted). For NPs with random grafting, the polymers phase-separate on the surface of the NP to form Janus-type structures in dilute solution, even though some of the chains have to stretch around the particle to form the Janus structure. When the solvent quality is sufficiently poor for the solvophobic chains, the binary grafted NPs assemble into various structures, including double-walled vesicles. In particular, vesicles are formed when the solvophilic volume fraction is between 0.2 and 0.3, in a similar range to that required for vesicle formation in diblock copolymers in a selective solvent. For mixed-grafted NPs, there is considerable variation in the structure of each individual NP, but nevertheless, these NPs form ordered vesicles, similar to those formed by Janus-grafted NPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据