4.1 Article

Incorporating Hydrophobic Cellulose Nanocrystals inside Latex Particles via Mini-Emulsion Polymerization

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mren.202100023

关键词

cellulose nanocrystals; droplet nucleation; encapsulation; mini-emulsion polymerization; pressure-sensitive adhesives

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada [CRDPJ 492852-15]
  2. FPI nnovations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the encapsulation of hydrophobic cellulose nanocrystals in polymeric latex particles through mini-emulsion polymerization. It is found that under certain conditions, effective encapsulation of CNC can be achieved. As the CNC loading increases, the performance of the nanocomposite materials improves but the polymerization rate decreases.
Hydrophobic cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are encapsulated inside poly(butyl acrylate/vinyl acetate/acrylic acid) latex particles via mini-emulsion polymerization (MEP). To achieve a genuine MEP, the effects of the concentration of surfactants (sodium dodecyl sulfate/Disponil A3065) and a hydrophobic agent (octadecyl acrylate (ODA)) are optimized in the presence of 0.5 wt% CNC. Using a combination of surfactant and ODA concentrations leading to a particle nucleation method restricted to the monomer droplets, the effects of CNC loading up to 1.5 wt% on the polymerization process and final nanocomposite properties are studied. Despite an increase in particle size and a lower rate of polymerization at higher CNC loadings, the droplet nucleation mechanism remains dominant up to 1.25 wt% CNC loading. Pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) performance for nanocomposites produced using hydrophobic CNCs in MEP decreases whereas performance improves considerably when using hydrophilic and partially hydrophobic CNCs in conventional emulsion polymerization. These results shed light on emulsion polymerization technique selection and CNC surface properties for greener industrial production of water-based PSAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据