4.4 Article

Reprocessable Supramolecular Elastomers of Poly(Siloxane-Urethane) via Self-Complementary Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 222, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/macp.202100116

关键词

hydrogen bonding ureidopyrimidinone; poly(siloxane-urethane); reprocessable materials; supramolecules

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21901144, 21774070]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2020QB021]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2018TB035, 2019GN067]
  4. Young Scholars Program of Shandong University
  5. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Special Functional Aggregated Materials, Ministry of Education, P. R. China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By introducing quadruple hydrogen bond motifs into the main chain of polysiloxane, researchers have created a new type of supramolecular silicone elastomers, allowing for better control of polymer network structure. These materials exhibit elastomeric properties and robust reprocessability, and can potentially be further developed into europium-coordinated elastomers with interesting water-responsive luminescence, expanding the scope and application of silicone-based sustainable materials.
Supramolecular silicone materials are promising candidates toward sustainable and recyclable applications. Herein, quadruple hydrogen bond motifs are introduced into the main chain of polysiloxane for the first time, providing a new type of supramolecular silicone elastomers. This structural design enables the well-defined spacing length between ureidopyrimidinone (UPY) units, exercising better control over polymer network structure. The obtained materials exhibit elastomeric properties and robust reprocessability, and can be further developed into europium (Eu)-coordinated elastomers with interesting water-responsive luminescence. It is highly anticipated that this work will broaden the scope and application of silicone-based sustainable materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据