4.7 Article

Digestive behavior of unemulsified triglycerides with different chain lengths: In vitro dynamic and static simulated digestion models

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112006

关键词

Glyceryl tributyrate; Glyceryl tridodecanoate; Glycerol tripalmitate; Simulated dynamic digestion; Simulated static digestion

资金

  1. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [D19C200001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32072224]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the digestion behaviors of unemulsified GTB, GTD, and GTP in dynamic and static simulation digestion models. The results showed that the digestibility sequence was GTB > GTD > GTP, with the dynamic model showing more pronounced triglyceride hydrolysis.
Glyceryl tributyrate (GTB), glyceryl tridodecanoate (GTD) and glycerol tripalmitate (GTP) are typically short, medium and long-chain fatty acid glycerides, respectively. Their digestion behaviors play decisive roles in their health benefits. In this study, the digestion behaviors of unemulsified GTB, GTD and GTP were compared in the dynamic simulation digestion model (artificial gastric digestive system and semi-dynamic intestinal digestive system) and static simulation digestion model. In these two models, the digestibility is GTB > GTD > GTP. In the gastric phase, 4.5%-24.5% of triglycerides were hydrolyzed, and this phenomenon was more obvious in the dynamic model. In addition, the transition of digestive behaviors from the stomach to the intestine was smoother in the dynamic model. The particle size of GTB is usually smaller than those of GTD and GTP, and this difference was weakened in the dynamic model. The high melting point of GTD and GTP also hindered their binding with digestive enzymes in digestion. Our research filled the gaps in the study of the digestion behaviors of unemulsified triglycerides with different chain lengths in different models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据