4.7 Article

Optimization of the process parameters of ultrasound on inhibition of polyphenol oxidase activity in whole potato tuber by response surface methodology

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111232

关键词

Ultrasound treatment; Whole potato; Polyphenol oxidase; Response surface methodology; Micro-structure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31701667]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that ultrasound can effectively inhibit the polyphenol oxidase activity of potatoes, and optimal conditions were determined to achieve this. The impact of ultrasound treatment on the micro-structures of potatoes was also observed.
In this study, the polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity of whole potatoes was inhibited by ultrasound. A 17-run Box-Behnken Design was used to optimize the ultrasound conditions for inhibiting the PPO activity. Three factors of ultrasound treatment including power, time, and temperature were investigated. Moreover, the effects of ultrasound treatment on the PPO activity of ultrasound-treated bruising damaged whole potatoes as well as on the micro-structure of the ultrasound-treated whole potatoes were evaluated. The adjusted coefficients of determination for models of Y-1 and Y-2 were 0.9980 and 0.9991, respectively. The p-values of two models for the responses were below 0.05, implying that the models can well represent PPO activities. The optimal ultrasound conditions were determined to be: ultrasound power 540 W, ultrasound time 15 min, and temperature 20 degrees C. Under these conditions, the mean PPO activities of the whole potatoes were 44.948 U/g, in accordance with the values predicted by the model. Besides, the PPO activity increases in the damaged whole potatoes. Nevertheless, the PPO activity of the ultrasound-treated whole potatoes was lower than that of untreated whole potatoes. Moreover, the power and time of ultrasound have a large impact on the micro-structures of the whole potatoes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据