4.7 Article

Real-world evidence in hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 61-67

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.14864

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; real-world data; real-world evidence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Real-world evidence includes health-related information obtained outside of clinical trials, which can provide insights into disease progression and treatment effectiveness. Global regulatory agencies have utilized real-world data to inform drug development and refine therapeutic regimens post-marketing, especially in underrepresented populations. In the management of hepatocellular carcinoma, early detection offers the best chance for curative therapies, while novel systemic treatments have improved survival rates. Longitudinal observational studies in real-world settings can help assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of these therapies.
Real-world evidence includes all health-related information, such as electronic health records, insurance claims, pharmacy records and wearables that are obtained outside of clinical trials. These data can provide critical insights into the natural history of disease and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of treatment regimens used in clinical practice. Real-world data have been applied to varying degrees by global regulatory agencies to inform and expedite many phases of drug development and help refine the use of therapeutic regimens after marketing, especially in populations that are under-represented in registration trials. For the management of hepatocellular carcinoma, early detection provides the best chance for curative therapies, whose success has been evaluated in numerous cohorts. The availability of novel systemic therapies, including kinase inhibitors and immunotherapies, has provided new treatment options and improved survival in patients with advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Real-world longitudinal observational studies can help understand the long-term safety and effectiveness of these agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据