4.5 Article

Dielectric reorientation and electrohydrodynamic instabilities in dichroic-dye-doped dual-cell liquid crystal smart window

期刊

LIQUID CRYSTALS
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 111-122

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02678292.2021.1945692

关键词

Smart window; dichroic dyes; dynamic scattering mode; electrohydrodynamic instabilities (EHDIs); threshold voltage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper introduces a dual-cell smart window based on dichroic-dyed-doped liquid crystal, demonstrating its capability to switch among transparent, dark, and scattering states. Various characterizations, including ion concentration, voltage holding ratios, and POM observations, are conducted, along with measurements of polarized and non-polarized voltage-transmittance and haze characteristics. The increase in transmittance of the dual cell after the Freedericksz regime is explained and verified through simulations, with the investigation of the triggering threshold voltage for electrohydrodynamic instabilities under different conditions.
The paper demonstrates a dual-cell smart window based on dichroic-dyed-doped liquid crystal that is switchable among transparent, dark and scattering states. The dual-cell forms the crossed-polariser structure so very low transmittance is achieved. To characterise the concentration of ions in cells, voltage holding ratios with and without doping the dyes are measured. Polarisation optical microscopy (POM) of single cell that shows the transition from Freedericksz regime to turbulent state is also shown. In addition, the polarised and non-polarised voltage-transmittance and haze characteristics of the cells are measured. The increase in transmittance of dual cell after Freedericksz regime is explained and verified by simulations. By identifying the voltage when transmittance first increases as the threshold voltage of triggering electrohydrodynamic instabilities (EHDIs), its dependence on temperature, waveform, amplitude and frequency of driving voltage is investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据