4.3 Article

Venetoclax-based combinations in AML and high-risk MDS prior to and following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 62, 期 14, 页码 3394-3401

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1966788

关键词

Acute myeloid leukemia; AML; MDS; venetoclax; transplant

资金

  1. NCI's Cancer Clinical Investigator Team Leadership Award (CCITLA)
  2. MSKCC Clinical Scholars T32 Program [2T32 CA009512-31]
  3. Conquer Cancer Young Investigator Award [GC241610]
  4. NCI of the National Institutes of Health [P30 CA016359]
  5. Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant [P30 CA008748]
  6. American Society of Hematology (ASH) Fellow Scholar Award in Clinical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that using venetoclax as consolidation therapy before allo-HCT in AML or MDS patients can improve the 12-month survival rate, and venetoclax-based salvage therapy after allo-HCT can provide a potential salvage treatment option with a 12-month survival rate around 43.4%.
The role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) as consolidation after initial venetoclax therapy and the efficacy of venetoclax salvage therapy for relapse after allo-HCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are unclear. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who received venetoclax either before or after allo-HCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Yale University from 11 August 2016 to 16 November 2020. Among 39 heavily pretreated patients who received venetoclax before allo-HCT, median OS from allo-HCT was not reached after a median follow up of 12.5 months resulting in a 12-month OS estimate of 79.0%. In 37 patients who had received venetoclax-based combinations as salvage therapy after allo-HCT, the overall response rate was 32% with a median OS of 4.7 months (12-month OS estimate: 43.4%). Four patients underwent a second allo-HCT following venetoclax-based salvage therapy suggesting it as a potential salvage treatment option.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据