4.7 Review

Current challenges and unmet medical needs in myelodysplastic syndromes

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 2182-2198

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01265-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Jazz Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, variable cytopenias, and a risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Current treatments for MDS lack a clear standard of care, and there is a need for new, more effective but tolerable strategies. Advances in molecular diagnostics have improved understanding of the genetic abnormalities driving MDS, necessitating complex personalized treatment approaches.
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms that are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, variable cytopenias, and a risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Most patients with MDS are affected by anemia and anemia-related symptoms, which negatively impact their quality of life. While many patients with MDS have lower-risk disease and are managed by existing treatments, there currently is no clear standard of care for many patients. For patients with higher-risk disease, the treatment priority is changing the natural history of the disease by delaying disease progression to acute myeloid leukemia and improving overall survival. However, existing treatments for MDS are generally not curative and many patients experience relapse or resistance to first-line treatment. Thus, there remains an unmet need for new, more effective but tolerable strategies to manage MDS. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of MDS, and it is becoming clear that the diverse nature of genetic abnormalities that drive MDS demands a complex and personalized treatment approach. This review will discuss some of the challenges related to the current MDS treatment landscape, as well as new approaches currently in development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据