4.6 Article

Construction of a Carbon Dots/Cobalt Oxyhydroxide Nanoflakes Biosensing Platform for Detection of Acid Phosphatase

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 37, 期 35, 页码 10529-10537

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01512

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22074154, 21822407]
  2. Gansu Youth Science and Technology Fund Project [20JR10RA051]
  3. Gansu Innovation Group Project [20JR5RA573]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A fluorescence platform for monitoring acid phosphatase (ACP) levels was established by assembling red emitting carbon dots (RCDs) on cobalt oxyhydroxide (CoOOH) nanoflakes. The fluorescence of the RCDs could be quenched by the nanoflakes, but was recovered by the reduction of CoOOH nanoflakes catalyzed by ACP. The biosensor showed rapid, sensitive, and selective detection of ACP with a low detection limit.
Because abnormal acid phosphatase (ACP) can disrupt the normal physiological processes, determination of ACP level is extremely important for early diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic evaluation of diseases. Herein, a fluorescence platform for monitoring ACP level was established based on the assembly of redemitting carbon dots (RCDs) on cobalt oxyhydroxide (CoOOH) nanoflakes. RCDs displayed excellent water solubility, pH stability, salt resistance, and photobleaching resistance. Interestingly, the fluorescence of the RCDs assembled on the surface of the CoOOH nanoflakes could be quenched due to the energy transfer caused by the nanoflakes. However, the ascorbic acid (AA) produced by the hydrolysis of ascorbic acid-2-phosphate trisodium salt (AAP) catalyzed by ACP could quickly and effectively reduce CoOOH nanoflakes, leading to the fluorescence recovery of the RCDs. Therefore, an off-on biosensor platform for rapid, sensitive, and selective detection of ACP was constructed with a limit of detection of 0.25 mU/L. With the assistance of the biosensor, the level of ACP in human serum samples was evaluated, and the spike recovery values ranged from 94.0% to 104.5%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据