4.6 Article

Wettability Reversal on Dolomite Surfaces by Divalent Ions and Surfactants: An Experimental and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 37, 期 22, 页码 6641-6649

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00415

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alchemy Sciences Inc.
  2. Hess Corporation
  3. University of Wyoming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The wettability characteristics of dolomite surfaces and influencing factors were studied through experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. The results indicate that the cationic surfactant can weaken the attraction between the oil phase and carboxylates, while the anionic surfactant tends to maintain the oil-wetness of the dolomite surface.
Due to the importance of the dolomite mineral in carbonate reservoirs, the wettability characteristics of dolomite surfaces were studied with both experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. Contact angle measurements confirm that the dolomite surface can be rendered oil-wet by carboxylates (acidic components of crude oil) and that the cationic surfactant can reverse the oil-wetness more effectively than the anionic surfactant used in this study. The oil-wetness of an aged dolomite chip was reduced when treated with MgSO4 solution at 80 degrees C, while CaCl2, MgCl2, and Na2SO4 solutions did not produce any significant wettability alteration. The effects of surfactants and divalent ions, Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42- (also referred to as Smart Water ions), were simulated with two model dolomite surfaces containing point defects and step vacancies, respectively. The results indicate that the cationic surfactant can weaken the attraction between the oil phase and the carboxylates, while the anionic surfactant tends to maintain the oil-wetness of the dolomite surface by replacing the carboxylates through competitive adsorption. All Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42- ions can act as potential determining ions, and the detachment of carboxylates is due to the repulsion from SO42- ions drawn close to the surface in the presence of adsorbed Mg2+.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据