4.5 Article

The Ku70/80 ring in Non-Homologous End-Joining: easy to slip on, hard to remove

期刊

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 514-527

出版社

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2741/4406

关键词

Ku70; Ku80; Degradation; Double strand break; NEDD8; Non-homologous end-joining; NHEJ; SCF; RNF8; Proteasome; Ubiquitylation; Review

资金

  1. Danish Council for Independent Research (Natural Sciences) [12-128803]
  2. Danish Cancer Society
  3. Lundbeck Foundation
  4. Fru Astrid Thaysens Legat for Laegevidenskabelig Grundforskning [ALT 14/01]
  5. Else og Mogens Wedell - Wedellsborgs Fond [27-15-1]
  6. Arvid Nilssons Fond
  7. Fabrikant Ejner Willumsens Mindelegat
  8. Nordea-Fonden
  9. Danish Council for Independent Research (Health and Disease) [12-125862]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is an essential DNA double strand break repair pathway during all cell cycle stages. Deficiency in NHEJ factors can lead to accumulation of unrepaired DNA breaks or faulty DNA repair, which may ultimately result in cell death, senescence or carcinogenesis. The Ku70/80 heterodimer is a key-player in the NHEJ pathway and binds to DNA termini with high affinity, where it helps to protect DNA ends from degradation and to recruit other NHEJ factors required for repair. The mechanism of Ku70/80 detachment from the DNA helix after completion of DNA repair is incompletely understood. Some data suggest that certain DNA repair factors are ubiquitylated and targeted for proteasomal degradation after repair. Recent studies suggest that Ku80 is conjugated to lysine48-linked ubiquitin chains by the Skp1-CullinF-box (SCF) complex and/or the RING finger protein 8 (RNF8) ubiquitin-protein ligases, followed by rapid proteasomal degradation. In this review we address the structure and function of the Ku70/80 heterodimer and how ubiquitylation may affect the release of Ku70/80 from chromatin and its subsequent degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据