4.8 Article

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

期刊

LANCET
卷 398, 期 10302, 页码 759-771

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Merck Sharp Dohme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the antitumor activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced esophageal cancer. Results showed that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Background First-line therapy for advanced oesophageal cancer is currently limited to fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer and Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Methods We did a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study across 168 medical centres in 26 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer or Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 status), measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (chemotherapy), once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, histology, and performance status. Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to group assignment and PD-L1 biomarker status. Primary endpoints were overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719, and is closed to recruitment. Findings Between July 25, 2017, and June 3, 2019, 1020 patients were screened and 749 were enrolled and randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=373 [50%]) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=376 [50%]). At the first interim analysis (median follow-up of 22.6 months), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (median 13.9 months vs 8.8 months; hazard ratio 0.57 [95% CI 0.43-0.75]; p<0.0001), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (12.6 months vs 9.8 months; 0.72 [0.60-0.88]; p=0.0006), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (13.5 months vs 9.4 months; 0.62 [0.49-0.78]; p<0.0001), and in all randomised patients (12.4 months vs 9.8 months; 0.73 [0.62-0.86]; p<0.0001). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (6.3 months vs 5.8 months; 0.65 [0.54-0.78]; p<0.0001), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (7.5 months vs 5.5 months; 0.51 [0.41-0.65]; p<0.0001), and in all randomised patients (6.3 months vs 5.8 months; 0.65 [0.55-0.76]; p<0.0001). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 266 (72%) patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 250 (68%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Interpretation Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with previously untreated, advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients regardless of histology, and had a manageable safety profile in the total as-treated population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据