3.9 Editorial Material

EDTA-Induced Pseudothrombocytopenia up to 9 Months after Initial COVID-19 Infection Associated with Persistent Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG Seropositivity

期刊

LABORATORY MEDICINE
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 206-209

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/labmed/lmab050

关键词

EDTA-induced pseudothrombocytopenia; SARS-CoV-2 virus infection; COVID-19; persisting anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG seropositivity; antinucleocapsid antibody; anti-Spike 1 receptor binding domain (anti-S1-RBD); anti-Spike 1 and Spike 2 (anti-S1/S2) IgG test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Platelets play a significant role in vascular complications of COVID-19-related viral coagulopathy, and immune-induced thrombocytopenia has been reported in moderate-to-severe cases. The prognostic role of platelet count in COVID-19 is still controversial, and the presence of EDTA-induced pseudothrombocytopenia in patients even after 9 months post initial infection suggests a possible link to anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
Platelets have a role in vascular complications of COVID-19-related viral coagulopathy. Although immune-induced thrombocytopenia has been described mostly in moderate-to-severe COVID-19, the prognostic role of platelet count in COVID-19 is still controversial. Pseudothrombocytopenia has been reported to represent COVID-19-associated coagulopathy in critical illness, and transient EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia lasting less than 3 weeks was described in a patient with severe acute COVID-19 pneumonia. In our case study, EDTA-induced pseudothrombocytopenia was still present at 9 months after an initial SARS-CoV-2 virus infection in an apparently recovered 60 year old man. The persistence of antinucleocapside and antispike antibodies 9 months after the initial infection suggests that EDTA-induced pseudothrombocytopenia may be related to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG or IgM antibodies. We should acknowledge the possibility that pseudothrombocytopenia may also appear in some patients after seroconversion after the launch of large-scale vaccination programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据