4.6 Article

Light and dissolved phosphorus interactively affect microbial metabolism, stoichiometry and decomposition of leaf litter

期刊

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
卷 61, 期 6, 页码 1006-1019

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12763

关键词

detritus; mineralisation; nutrient enrichment; periphyton; priming effect

资金

  1. National Science Foundation, Division of Environmental Biology [DEB 1020722]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In aquatic settings, light can stimulate algal growth to affect microbial transformation of organic substrates. These effects may depend on dissolved nutrients that differentially constrain microbial autotrophy and heterotrophy to drive contrasting carbon (C) and phosphorus (P) dynamics during decomposition. We incubated sugar maple (Acer saccharum) litter under three dissolved P amendments (0, 50 or 500gL(-1) P) and two light levels (14 or 475mol photonsm(-2)s(-1)) in laboratory microcosms. We measured litter chlorophyll a, microbial respiration and net metabolism, carbon:nitrogen (C:N) and C:P content, microbial P uptake and release and litter decomposition over 134days. Elevated dissolved P increased algal biomass in the high-light treatment and magnified net heterotrophy and autotrophy in the low- and high-light treatments, respectively. Litter C:P and C:N declined as dissolved P increased, and litter C:P was further reduced by high light only in the highest P treatment. Microbial P uptake fluxes peaked under moderate P and high light, whereas P release fluxes were consistently low throughout the experiment. The percent of P uptake that was released was significantly higher under low light. High light stimulated decomposition under low P but slowed decomposition under high P, suggesting increased nutrients weakened algal priming of litter decomposition. Our study suggests factors controlling the degree of autotrophy versus heterotrophy on organic matter, such as light and nutrient availability, may interactively shift litter C and P dynamics during decomposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据