4.7 Article

A knowledge-based experts' system for evaluation of digital supply chain readiness

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107262

关键词

Digital supply chain; Readiness; Digital transformation; Fuzzy-AHP; Relationship; Knowledge base system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of digital supply chain poses new challenges for companies, requiring the transformation of traditional supply chains into digital ones. This paper proposes a knowledge-based system to evaluate organizations' readiness for digital supply chain and validates it in an Indian manufacturing company.
The digitalization of the supply chain (SC) enables companies to address customers' new requirements, the challenges of managing the SC and the expectations, and efficiency improvement. Although digital supply chain (DSC) is a buzzword, very few organizations and decision-makers understand the challenges of transforming from a traditional supply chain to a DSC. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to develop and implement an integrated knowledge-based system (KBS) and evaluate the overall DSC readiness value (score) of an organization. DSC readiness factors are identified from an extensive literature review and validated by experts from academia and industry. The proposed KBS is based on Fuzzy-AHP that establishes a link between DSC readiness factors and their impact on performance and evaluates overall DSC readiness value (score). The proposed KBS has been validated in an Indian manufacturing company, and results show that the overall DSC readiness value (score) of the case company is 0.267. This paper will help organizations evaluate their current position in transforming from traditional supply chain to DSC and make a plan to achieve digitalization completely in their SC operations. Managers, practitioners, and decision-makers who are involved in digitalization can use our study's findings as a starting point for aiding the transformation. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据