4.4 Article

Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation as the keystone in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease Expert Opinion of the Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology Section of the Polish Cardiac Society

期刊

KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA
卷 79, 期 7-8, 页码 901-916

出版社

POLISH CARDIAC SOC
DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2021.0066

关键词

cardiac rehabilitation; coronary artery disease; exercise training; secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation is considered an effective method for treating cardiovascular disease in Europe, which should be implemented as soon as possible, continued without interruption, tailored to individual clinical situations, and supported by the patient and their family.
Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a mainstay of the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation has the highest class of recommendation and level of evidence as an effective method for the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, after myocardial revascularization, with chronic coronary syndrome, for CVD prevention in clinical practice, and in patients with heart failure (HF). This document presents an expert opinion of the Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology Section of the Polish Cardiac Society concerning the definition, goals, target population, organization of rehabilitation services, standard clinical indications, and methods of implementation. Moreover, it describes psychosocial risk factors influencing the course of CR and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing CR. Comprehensive CR is a process that should be implemented as soon as possible, continued without interruption, and should consist of multiple stages. Moreover, it should be tailored to the individual clinical situation and should be accepted by the patient and their family, friends, and caregivers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据