4.7 Article

Influence of porosity of reformed earth embankment windbreak wall on flow field and displacement of catenary under crosswinds

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104652

关键词

Porosity; Windbreak wall; CFD; FEM; Flow field; Wind-induced displacement; Crosswind

资金

  1. Technology Research and Development Program of China Railway Corporation [2017J010-B]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University of Central South University [1053320211135, 1053320210633]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used CFD to simulate the flow fields around five REEWWs with different porosities, and analyzed wind-induced displacement of the catenary using FEM. The results showed that a windbreak with 37.5% porosity significantly reduced wind speed and catenary displacement, improving protection performance.
Flow fields around reformed earth embankment windbreak walls (REEWWs) with five different porosities under crosswind were studied using the improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) based on the SST kappa-omega. turbulence model by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in this paper. Based on the simulated flow field results, the finite element method (FEM) was adopted to analyze the wind-induced displacement of the catenary. The spatial dimensions of the five REEWWs were identical, but they had different porosities, with values of 0%, 12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, and 50%. The three-dimensional effects of the porosity on the flow structures and streamline patterns around the REEWWs and catenary, and wind-induced displacement of the catenary were investigated. The numerical algorithm used in this study was verified with the results from field tests. The results showed that installing a porous windshield on the top of the earth embankment windbreak wall will change the original flow structures. The windshield with a porosity of 37.5% reduced the wind speed around the catenary by 61.25% for line1 and 89.36% for line2, and the displacement of the catenary was reduced by 96.86%. Therefore, the protection performance of the catenary was improved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据