4.7 Article

Field measurement study of wind characteristics at different measuring positions along a bridge in a mountain valley

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104705

关键词

Wind characteristics; Stationary model; Non-stationary model; Field measurement; Mountain valley

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778545]
  2. Science and Technology Projects of Power China [SCMQ-201728-ZB]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated wind field characteristics at a bridge in a mountain valley using a non-stationary wind speed model. It found that terrain significantly influenced mean wind speed and direction. Strong-wind weather conditions measurements were analyzed non-stationary, showing the strong non-stationarity of the mountain valley wind field.
Wind field characteristics were investigated with a non-stationary wind speed model at a bridge in a mountain valley, where five anemometers were set along the bridge span for long-term field measurements. The mean wind characteristics, such as mean wind speed and direction, were studied with a traditional steady wind-speed model, which showed the significant influence of the terrain on the mean wind characteristics. In addition, data for certain strong-wind weather conditions were measured, and the non-stationary analysis of strong wind samples were conducted using the run test and wavelet analysis. Subsequently, the characteristics of the fluctuating wind-time-varying mean wind speed, turbulence intensity, turbulence integral scale, and power spectral density (PSD)-were compared based on the two wind speed models. The comparative results indicated that the mountain valley wind field was substantially affected by the terrain and exhibited a strong non-stationarity. However, there were certain differences between the wind field characteristics of the two wind speed models, and the recommended value was not completely consistent for the field measurements in the current specification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据