4.5 Article

Fluctuating temperatures extend longevity in pupae and adult stages of the sepsid Themira biloba

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL BIOLOGY
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102959

关键词

Fluctuating temperatures; FTR; Insect storage; Longevity; Non-model

资金

  1. United States Department of Agri-culture, Agricultural Research Service
  2. Edward T. Schafer Agricul-tural Research Center
  3. North Dakota State University College of Science and Mathematics
  4. Department of Biological Sciences
  5. NSF RII Track-2 FEC [1826834]
  6. USDA-ARS [3060-21220-032-00D]
  7. Office of Integrative Activities
  8. Office Of The Director [1826834] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluctuating Thermal Regimes (FTR) have been proven effective in extending the longevity and generation time of fruit flies, with no increase in mortality. By using FTR, pupation time of fruit flies was extended from 4 days to 8 weeks, and mean adult longevity was increased from 12 days to 50 days, reducing the resources needed for maintaining rare and exotic insects.
Fluctuating Thermal Regimes (FTR), where organisms are held at low temperatures with a brief, daily warm pulse, have been shown to increase longevity in adult insects and improve pupa survival while reducing sublethal effects. We used FTR to extend the longevity and thus generation time of the fly species Themira biloba (Diptera: Sepsidae). T. biloba can be maintained in continuous culture and requires an insecticide-free dung substrate for larval growth and development. Our objective was to decrease labor and consumable materials required to maintain insect species in critical scientific collections using FTR. We extended pupation time from 4 days up to 8 weeks with no increase in mortality, and mean adult longevity was increased from 12 days to 50 days. FTR is a valuable tool for reducing the investment required to maintain rare and exotic insects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据