4.7 Article

Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalyst: Comparison between comprehensive kinetic modeling, Artificial Neural Network, and a novel hybrid GA-Fuzzy models

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2021.07.041

关键词

Mamdani Fuzzy Inference; Artificial Neural Network (ANN); Kinetic model; Genetic Algorithm (GA); Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalyst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three different models were developed to predict the behavior of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalyst, with the GA-Fuzzy model showing higher performance and interpretability, while the kinetic model provided a more realistic representation of reactor behavior.
Background: Fischer - Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is a direct route for producing liquid fuels. Methods: To predict the behavior of FTS over Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalyst, three different models including a novel hybrid GA-Fuzzy model, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model, and a comprehensive kinetic model were developed. The models' outputs were CO conversion and the selectivity of CH4 and C-5(+), whereas the models' inputs were pressure, H-2/CO ratio, temperature, and GHSV. For the GA-Fuzzy model, a novel technique was developed to optimize the qualitative definition of input/output variables along with the fuzzy rules to improve the model performance. For the ANN model, an optimum two-layer neural network was developed. For the kinetic model (derived based on Langmuir-Freundlich technique), the elementary reactions were suggested based on alkyl mechanism and included re-adsorption and hydrogenation on the secondary active sites of the catalyst. Significant Findings: The models' prediction errors were 8.27%, 4.59%, and 12.56% for GA-Fuzzy, ANN, and kinetic models, respectively. The GA-Fuzzy model had higher interpretability, transparency, and generality compared to the ANN model. Besides, the kinetic model provided a more realistic representation of the reactor behavior. The optimized operating conditions of the reactor were also found, which were 240 degrees C, 24 bar, 1233.78 h(-1) for GHSV, and 2.5 for H-2/CO ratio. (C) 2021 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据