4.3 Article

Magnetic Properties of a Mixed Spin-(1/2,5/2) Chain in (4-Cl-o-MePy-V)FeCl4

期刊

出版社

PHYSICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.7566/JPSJ.90.064707

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grant for Basic Science Research Projects from KAKENHI [17H04850, 19J01004, 19H04550]
  2. Murata Science Foundation
  3. Kyoto Technoscience Center
  4. SEI Group CSR Foundation
  5. Nanotechnology Platform Program (Molecule and Material Synthesis) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H04850, 19J01004, 19H04550] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The magnetic properties of a mixed spin-(1/2, 5/2) chain in a charge-transfer salt were investigated, confirming the formation of the chain and observing a clear LM magnetization plateau. The magnetic susceptibility and specific heat further confirmed the formation of the LM ferrimagnetic state.
The magnetic properties of a mixed spin-(1/2, 5/2) chain produced in a charge-transfer salt (4-Cl-o-MePy-V)FeCl4 were investigated. The formation of a mixed spin-(1/2, 5/2) chain with a slight bond alternation was confirmed by molecular orbital calculations. An entire magnetization curve was observed until the point of saturation, which included a clear Leib-Mattis (LM) magnetization plateau and subsequent quantum phase transition toward the gapless Luttinger liquid phase. The magnetic susceptibility and specific heat further confirmed the formation of the LM ferrimagnetic state. A root T contribution was clearly observed in the low-temperature specific heat, which indicated the contributions of the low-energy magnon excitations in the LM ferrimagnetic state. Electron spin resonance analysis was used to evaluate the effective interchain couplings that resulted in the antiferromagnetic order and on-site biaxial anisotropy associated with the spin-flop transition. In addition, the effects of magnetic anisotropy on the low-energy magnon excitations in the LM plateau phase were evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据