4.4 Article

Useful relations for the analysis of stellar scintillation at the entrance pupil of a telescope

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.420572

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of new techniques in characterizing atmospheric optical turbulence has become a recent research focus, with the introduction of a dimensionless Fresnel filter for approximating polychromatic weighting functions. The study also explores matching conditions for weighting functions in different apertures, as well as the application of linear digital filters to scintillation signals. Main limitations of this approach, such as finite pixel size, aliasing, and finite image detector size, are discussed.
The development of new techniques for characterizing atmospheric optical turbulence (OT) has become an active topic of research again in recent years. In order to facilitate these studies, we reconsidered known theoretical results and obtained some new practically useful conclusions. We introduce a dimensionless Fresnel filter, which allows us to approximate a polychromatic weighting function (WF) by a monochromatic one with a typical precision of several percent. A so-called dimensionless WF can be easily scaled for a receiving aperture of any size. For the case of a circular aperture and monochromatic radiation, an analytical expression for the WF was found. The WFs for a square aperture and for a circular aperture match with relative difference less than 0.01 if the circular aperture diameter is 1.15 times larger than the square aperture side. A linear digital filter can be applied to the scintillation signal from an image detector. As an example of digital filtering, we considered the power law filter proportional to f5/3 with the WF being constant in a wide range of altitudes. We discuss the main limitations of this approach for measuring OT integral: finite pixel size, aliasing, and finite image detector size. (c) 2021 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据