4.7 Article

Bio-chemo-mechanical theory of active shells

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104419

关键词

Active shell; Bio-chemo-mechanical feedback; Morphogenesis; Bifurcation; Pattern transition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12032014, 11620101001, 11921002, 11922207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a bio-chemo-mechanical theoretical framework to model complex morphologies and dynamic behaviors in living thin structures. Hopf and Pitchfork bifurcations induced by chemomechanical feedback are found to be the primary mechanisms triggering pattern formation. The proposed numerical scheme can track the dynamic pattern evolution beyond the stationary state.
Living thin structures such as cell cortex layers and multicellular sheets often exhibit intricate morphologies and dynamic behaviors, including Turing's pattern, periodic oscillation, and wave propagation. In this paper, we present a bio-chemo-mechanical theoretical framework to model these morphogenetic processes and to unveil the underlying mechanisms. On the basis of the nonlinear non-Euclidean shell model, we formulate an active solid shell theory which couples the excitation and transmission of biochemical signals with mechanical forces. Through linear stability analysis, it is found that Hopf and Pitchfork bifurcations induced by chemomechanical feedback are two primary mechanisms that may trigger pattern formation. A numerical scheme is developed to solve the coordinated mechanical and biochemical fields in the active shell system and thus, to track the dynamic pattern evolution beyond the stationary state. For illustration, the proposed theory is applied to starfish oocytes and to decipher the synchronous protein dynamics and surface contraction pattern emerging in the anaphase of meiosis, which involves both global oscillation and traveling waves. This study underscores the crucial role of bio-chemo-mechanical feedback in driving morphogenetic pattern evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据